Hahaha! Vad i hela helvete håller Kadyrovs män på med? De fick motstånd direkt när de passerat gränsen och hade inte räknat med det, eller vadå? Trodde de att man bara kunde marschera på? 
Citat:
John Mearsheimer förutspådde redan 2014 att det som händer nu, skulle hända.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...-buffer-state/
https://www.theamericanconservative....us-so-in-2014/
Analysis & prediction on Ukraine from 6 years ago:
“The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path & the end result is Ukraine is going to get wrecked.”
-John J. Mearsheimer, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the U. of Chicago.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4&feature=share
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...2lzy3EyaCYL0Sp
12 sidor ovan som förklarar varför det är väst och USA som provocerat fram detta och varför ni idioter som tror Putin ska skapa Sovjet 2.0 är efterblivna.
.According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, an-nexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet
empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as
other countries in eastern Europe.
In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian
President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pre-text for Putin’s decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.
But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies
share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia’s orbit and integrate it into the West.
At the same time, the EU’s expansion eastward and the West’s backing of
the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine—beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004—were critical elements, too. Since the mid-
1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement
and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand
by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion.
For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected and pro-Russian president—which he rightly labeled a
“coup”—was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.
Putin’s pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia’s backyard and threathen strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly.
Vet att det går emot er världsbild och ni kommer skrika och gråta och storma med känslor - det spelar ingen roll.
Vad mig anbelangar är ni exakt det som är fel med världen och jag hoppas sannerligen ryssen tar segern. Då kan väst OCH USA inte gömma sina vidriga, fega handlingar bakom NATO eller andra proxys.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...-buffer-state/
https://www.theamericanconservative....us-so-in-2014/
Analysis & prediction on Ukraine from 6 years ago:
“The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path & the end result is Ukraine is going to get wrecked.”
-John J. Mearsheimer, R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the U. of Chicago.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4&feature=share
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...2lzy3EyaCYL0Sp
12 sidor ovan som förklarar varför det är väst och USA som provocerat fram detta och varför ni idioter som tror Putin ska skapa Sovjet 2.0 är efterblivna.
.According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, an-nexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet
empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as
other countries in eastern Europe.
In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian
President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pre-text for Putin’s decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.
But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies
share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia’s orbit and integrate it into the West.
At the same time, the EU’s expansion eastward and the West’s backing of
the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine—beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004—were critical elements, too. Since the mid-
1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement
and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand
by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion.
For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected and pro-Russian president—which he rightly labeled a
“coup”—was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.
Putin’s pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia’s backyard and threathen strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly.
Vet att det går emot er världsbild och ni kommer skrika och gråta och storma med känslor - det spelar ingen roll.
Vad mig anbelangar är ni exakt det som är fel med världen och jag hoppas sannerligen ryssen tar segern. Då kan väst OCH USA inte gömma sina vidriga, fega handlingar bakom NATO eller andra proxys.
Sorry men du are barkie at the wrong tree här.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
