Bara för man bajsar i en burk det står ärtsoppa på betyder det inte att det är ärtsoppa i burken.
Moscow solidified its hold on Crimea in April, outlawing the Tatar legislature that had opposed Russia’s annexation of the region since 2014. Together with Russian military provocations against NATO forces in and around the Baltic, this move seems to validate the observations of Western analysts who argue that under Vladimir Putin, an increasingly aggressive Russia is determined to dominate its neighbors and menace Europe.
Leaders in Moscow, however, tell a different story. For them, Russia is the aggrieved party. They claim the United States has failed to uphold a promise that NATO would not expand into Eastern Europe, a deal made during the 1990 negotiations between the West and the Soviet Union over German unification. In this view, Russia is being forced to forestall NATO’s eastward march as a matter of self-defense.
The West has vigorously protested that no such deal was ever struck. However, hundreds of memos, meeting minutes and transcripts from U.S. archives indicate otherwise. Although what the documents reveal isn’t enough to make Putin a saint, it suggests that the diagnosis of Russian predation isn’t entirely fair. Europe’s stability may depend just as much on the West’s willingness to reassure Russia about NATO’s limits as on deterring Moscow’s adventurism. [/b]
Dessa dokument är väldigt enkla att hitta. Det fanns ett avtal om icke-expansion åt öst.
Här är alla allianser och avtal USA brutit mot:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/...iran-deal/amp/
Axplock:
Treaties between the US and American Indian Nations (1722-1869)
Treaty of Versailles, 1919
International Labor Convention, 1949
Geneva Agreement, 1954
International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), 1966
The Law of the Sea, 1982
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, 1996
Mine-Ban Treaty, or Ottawa Treaty, 1997
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998
Kyoto Protocol, 1997
Paris Climate Accord, 2015
USA begick också krigsbrott när man begav sig till Syrien:
Is the US Presence in Syria illegal?
The presence is not illegal, the actions are. The Rational National, a Canadian who frequently comments on US policy, did a decent job describing it.
The UN Charter says that members should not use threat or force against a sovereign state, unless it is a self-defensive act or have the permission of the Security Council.
Americans were not under threat by Assad’s government, there is no self-defense. Nor did the OPCW finish their investigation which was interrupted by the recent airstrikes.
The Security Council did not give permission.
So yes, the US is acting as an aggressor with France and the UK in this. This is potentially a war crime.
Syria’s Civil War requires humanitarian aid, if the US really cared they would be giving real aid including aiding refuges.
This attack was for geopolitical reasons and not for any reason other than that.
The US, France, and UK committed a war crime.
Jag är långt ifrån lika skolad eller begåvad inom politik och historia som Putin.
Jag hade dock inte litat på fem öre när det gäller beskrivningen av NATO. Det har USA sett till med sina handlingar.
