Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av
trollkontroll
Donald Trump uppfyller även kriterierna för
diagnosen ”antisocial personlighetsstörning.”
Över 200 läkare och annan sjukvårdspersonal:
- Han är ”gravt olämplig” att leda landet.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...rge-conway-pac
https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/var...mp-narcissist/
Att Trump lider av något är inget nytt.
Vad tror alla hus doktorer på flashback?
1. Det är inte "läkare och annan sjukvårdspersonal" som sätter diagnoser, utan psykologer och psykiatriker.
2. Det är direkt oetiskt - och detta brukar psykologer och läkare själva ta upp i olika sammanhang - att diagnosticera någon "på distans," utan att göra en grundlig undersökning.
Här uttalar sig en psykiatriker:
Hello,
It is not illegal to talk and speculate about the diagnosis and attributes of mental health in a person not under his care. It is unethical, immature, and ill mannered for sure. A psychiatrist should never discuss or talk about mental health of persons under his care because of confidentiality and respect for the patient. However talking or discussion on mental health of a person not under care should be a strict no, but technically and legally not prohibited or illegal.
Hope this answers your question.
Thanks
Dr. Paramjeet Singh
Senior Consultant Psychiatrist
Delhi Mind Clinic
www.delhimindclinic.com
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-ilegal-f...just-unethical
Mer:
Larry Nutter
M.A. in Psychology, University of Northern Colorado (Graduated 1983)Author has 12.8K answers and 45.6M answer views5y
It is unethical and violates the American Psychiatric Association code of ethics. The Goldwater rule is the informal name given to section 7 in the American Psychiatric Association 's (APA) Principles of Medical Ethics, which states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures whom they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements. Psychiatrists attempted to torpedo Barry Goldwater as he ran for president. This was absolutely unethical behavior to diagnose and disparage a public figure they disagreed with and had never met.
Currently there are 1,000 psychiatrists who ignored the aforementioned Goldwater rule and are attempting to sabotage President Trump by signing a statement that he is not fit for office. None of them have evaluated President Trump and it is unethical to diagnose someone they have never seen. Psychiatrists need to tend to their patients and refrain from engaging in political activity (per Section 7 of the APA’s Principals of Medical Ethics)
Kan vi inte alla enas om att Trump, likt de flesta andra politiker i olika grad (kanske särskilt de som gör anspråk på att leda ett helt land och bli president), dras med mindre angenäma personlighetsdrag och lämna diagnostiseringar kring personlighetsstörningar därhän? Detta är politiskt käbbel, ingenting annat.