Flashback bygger pepparkakshus!
Mycket riktigt, jag hade glömt att Aftonbladet (eller om det var Expressen) körde den vinklingen.
Apropå vinklingar, Wired-artikeln som var "wikilekas leak" vinklad spreds som en löpeld fick nästan 400 retweets, medan http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news...ectid=10703996 NZHeraldn länken som har dessa detaljer i:
...inte har nått ett tjog retweets än. Tråkigt att den inte har mer retweets/facebook-länkar
edit: Noterar att en hel del svenskar har retweetat länken.
Resultat:
Skumt eller inte?
| Skumt |
|
4021 röster |
| Inte skumt |
|
1161 röster |
Citat:
Ursprungligen postat av flashback979
Var det inte Aftonhoran som körde med: Kondomen som kan fälla Assange?
...trots att de visste att kondomen inte hade DNA från någon av parterna, ingen DNA öht.
Man tycker verkligen synd om folk som inte läser news utanför Sveriges ruttna MSM. Sverige är ett gigantiskt projekt i social ingenjörskonst.
...trots att de visste att kondomen inte hade DNA från någon av parterna, ingen DNA öht.
Man tycker verkligen synd om folk som inte läser news utanför Sveriges ruttna MSM. Sverige är ett gigantiskt projekt i social ingenjörskonst.
Mycket riktigt, jag hade glömt att Aftonbladet (eller om det var Expressen) körde den vinklingen.
Apropå vinklingar, Wired-artikeln som var "wikilekas leak" vinklad spreds som en löpeld fick nästan 400 retweets, medan http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news...ectid=10703996 NZHeraldn länken som har dessa detaljer i:
Citat:
DNA belonging to "a male" was found in the other condom but the forensic report doesn't say if it belongs to Assange. No further forensic testing appears to have been done, nor are there any medical reports on the two women.
The documents show Assange was arrested in absentia within minutes of the two women reporting him for rape and sexual molestation, and before they had been questioned fully by police. Despite the serious nature of the allegations against Assange, many of the interviews were written down with pen and paper by the police, and not recorded. At one stage, the police inspector who questioned Wilen is said to have complained that she had been locked out of her original interrogation notes and couldn't produce a final version because of this.
In a note, the police inspector wrote that she was directed by her superior to "create and sign" a new interview document with unspecified "necessary changes".
Although Swedish chief prosecutor Eva Finne decided that there was no rape case to answer for Assange and rescinded the warrant for his arrest, the documents show that the police continued to investigate the WikiLeaks founder and interviewed witnesses for months. One witness questioned in September said that Ardin told him that she sat in on the interview with Wilen and helped "make her case stronger" by adding an unspecified sentence to the statement made.
The police inspector who interviewed Wilen is listed as a friend of Ardin on social-networking website Facebook.
Ardin and the inspector are both politically active in the Swedish Social Democratic Party.
Swedish law is strict about confidentiality and name suppression in sex crime investigations but Assange was named as a suspect immediately with his picture being sent out to media.
The documents show Assange was arrested in absentia within minutes of the two women reporting him for rape and sexual molestation, and before they had been questioned fully by police. Despite the serious nature of the allegations against Assange, many of the interviews were written down with pen and paper by the police, and not recorded. At one stage, the police inspector who questioned Wilen is said to have complained that she had been locked out of her original interrogation notes and couldn't produce a final version because of this.
In a note, the police inspector wrote that she was directed by her superior to "create and sign" a new interview document with unspecified "necessary changes".
Although Swedish chief prosecutor Eva Finne decided that there was no rape case to answer for Assange and rescinded the warrant for his arrest, the documents show that the police continued to investigate the WikiLeaks founder and interviewed witnesses for months. One witness questioned in September said that Ardin told him that she sat in on the interview with Wilen and helped "make her case stronger" by adding an unspecified sentence to the statement made.
The police inspector who interviewed Wilen is listed as a friend of Ardin on social-networking website Facebook.
Ardin and the inspector are both politically active in the Swedish Social Democratic Party.
Swedish law is strict about confidentiality and name suppression in sex crime investigations but Assange was named as a suspect immediately with his picture being sent out to media.
...inte har nått ett tjog retweets än. Tråkigt att den inte har mer retweets/facebook-länkar
edit: Noterar att en hel del svenskar har retweetat länken.
__________________
Senast redigerad av Kattafanken 2011-02-04 kl. 17:47.
Senast redigerad av Kattafanken 2011-02-04 kl. 17:47.
Kvinnorna nu outade med både namn & bild i internationell MSM. Skönt att man lämnar charaden av Ms A & Ms W och stora, pixlade bilder som tar upp halva artikeln & skärmen:
http://www.smh.com.au/world/assanges...ml?from=smh_sb
Artikeln ger en korrekt och relevant sammanfattning av FUP:en, t ex:
The full police report further complicates the picture. Perhaps the most central issue is the first complainant's shifting story as to whether the sexual encounter with Assange the night before the lecture had caused her to fear him. The next day Ardin had organised a ''crayfish party'' - a traditional Swedish summer get-together - for Assange; it was from this event that she sent the tweet that was later deleted, saying that it was 2am and she was partying with the ''most important people in the world''.
eller
he would claim she had asked Assange to leave - yet two witness statements in the police record say that she resisted multiple alternative offers to house Assange elsewhere than her 5 metre by 5 metre bedsit, with its sole double bed. Though she would later claim to have no knowledge of Sofia Wilen, the second complainant, witnesses recorded her as remarking that Assange had ''gone to have sex with the cashmere sweater girl'' - a mildly disparaging nickname that Ardin and her friends had developed for Wilen.
stämmer följande? Om ja...ouch.
Indeed, initially, Ardin made no complaint to the police of coercive sex at all, merely reporting two unwanted sexual advances that would be charged as misdemeanours in Sweden, and unprosecutable elsewhere
. Her accusation of sexual coercion appeared after the senior prosecutor had thrown out the one felony charge, and it was at that point that online accounts were altered. But it was the accusation of the second complainant, Wilen - that Assange had had unprotected sex with her while she was sleeping - that triggered a rape investigation.
But Wilen's account of events does not make it easy for prosecutors. After the sex, she says that she and Assange joked about her being pregnant. They both joked that they would call the child ''Afghanistan''. Hours later, after Assange had left, saying he'd call (he didn't), and following consultation with friends, Wilen decided to report that she'd been raped, and went to a hospital to have a rape-kit prepared. The account offers usable material to both defence and the police, but it may be moot - messages attached to the file record that Wilen has failed to sign the interview record, and may no longer wish to see Assange charged. All of which makes for a messy crayfish party indeed.
by Guy Rundle.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/assanges...ml?from=smh_sb
Artikeln ger en korrekt och relevant sammanfattning av FUP:en, t ex:
The full police report further complicates the picture. Perhaps the most central issue is the first complainant's shifting story as to whether the sexual encounter with Assange the night before the lecture had caused her to fear him. The next day Ardin had organised a ''crayfish party'' - a traditional Swedish summer get-together - for Assange; it was from this event that she sent the tweet that was later deleted, saying that it was 2am and she was partying with the ''most important people in the world''.
eller
he would claim she had asked Assange to leave - yet two witness statements in the police record say that she resisted multiple alternative offers to house Assange elsewhere than her 5 metre by 5 metre bedsit, with its sole double bed. Though she would later claim to have no knowledge of Sofia Wilen, the second complainant, witnesses recorded her as remarking that Assange had ''gone to have sex with the cashmere sweater girl'' - a mildly disparaging nickname that Ardin and her friends had developed for Wilen.
stämmer följande? Om ja...ouch.
Indeed, initially, Ardin made no complaint to the police of coercive sex at all, merely reporting two unwanted sexual advances that would be charged as misdemeanours in Sweden, and unprosecutable elsewhere
. Her accusation of sexual coercion appeared after the senior prosecutor had thrown out the one felony charge, and it was at that point that online accounts were altered. But it was the accusation of the second complainant, Wilen - that Assange had had unprotected sex with her while she was sleeping - that triggered a rape investigation.But Wilen's account of events does not make it easy for prosecutors. After the sex, she says that she and Assange joked about her being pregnant. They both joked that they would call the child ''Afghanistan''. Hours later, after Assange had left, saying he'd call (he didn't), and following consultation with friends, Wilen decided to report that she'd been raped, and went to a hospital to have a rape-kit prepared. The account offers usable material to both defence and the police, but it may be moot - messages attached to the file record that Wilen has failed to sign the interview record, and may no longer wish to see Assange charged. All of which makes for a messy crayfish party indeed.
by Guy Rundle.
__________________
Senast redigerad av flashback979 2011-02-04 kl. 17:47.
Senast redigerad av flashback979 2011-02-04 kl. 17:47.
Skapa ett konto eller logga in för att kommentera
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
