Början på ett mediakrig om mångkulturen?

Bästa är att lämna hela frågan. Kan centralförbund och ungdomsförbund fightas med palestinarörelsen bäst de vill. Kan vi ägna oss åt att förbättra Sverige.

In Denmark, too, several prominent Jews have joined the multiethnic cheerleading squad. At a hearing on anti-Semitism in March 1994, Israeli citizen, Mossad agent and former editor-in-chief of Politiken Herbert Pundik quite tellingly stated that “we want to educate the Danes so the Turks can be here”. Former head of information at the Danish Refugee Council Klaus Rothstein eagerly helped with this education by spewing out endless amounts of “informational materials” to convince Danes of the enrichment of receiving refugees. In the metropolitan area, the education was supported by Dan Tschernia, who as head of TV2 Lorry for 25 years ensured that viewers were bombarded daily with multicultural propaganda so that they gradually matured to accept the new colorful multicultural reality. Similarly, former editor of TV-Avisen and former editor-in-chief of Dagbladet Information Georg Metz has been one of immigration’s strongest advocates throughout his career, and he has never missed an opportunity to smear nationalist-minded Danes. The blessings and absolute necessity of mass immigration were also proclaimed by another well-known Jewish personality.

Like all developed countries, Russia is cursed with a strong Israel lobby, well entrenched in the cultural sphere; but at least in Russia it is less powerful than in the USA and in the UK. Over the years, the most active members of the Jewish lobby left for Israel, decimating its numbers. Still, what remains is strong enough to block all publications of any pro-Palestinian sentiment. Unsurprisingly, the Israel lobby dominates the Ukraine. Almost all Ukrainian oligarchs and media figures are of Jewish origin. They are also dead set against Trump.

Many people around the world are surprised that Jews in America vote for Democrats, even though Trump was clearly better for Israel. There is a big secret hidden here. All nations naturally find the Jews troublesome, and the Jews, like true Judoka, have learned to channel this feeling in their favour. Are you against the Jews? Then support Israel, they say. The gay parades in Tel Aviv are obviously anti-Jewish, being based on the denial of the traditional Jewish values (shlilat ha-golah, in Hebrew). Are you against Israel? Then support the Jews! Conservative Rabbis will sing you sweet songs about their hatred of Zionism. This heads-I-win-tails-you-lose tactic is not a new idea – back in the 1930’s of the last century Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini argued about it. The latter recommended that they accept Jewish fascists like Jabotinsky as allies. Hitler objected. Later Benito learned to his sorrow that such allies would fail him at the most inopportune moments.

Nowadays the formula has been simplified: Nazis support Israel, Progressives support international Jewry. And nobody is left who is against both. This divide-and-conquer alchemy works just as long as the Jews and Israel both remain awful. Some folks are bold enough to admit that Zionists are criminals, but then they immediately will cover themselves with political correctness by idolizing the Jews. Vice versa is also a viable opinion: the Jews are a problem that needs to be solved, and the State of Israel is that solution. This is an elementary dialectical ploy, but even Hitler was snared with this devise, being an enemy of Christ and His Church. Thus, he supported the Jews in their main task – in their fight against Christ.

I’ve often suggested that our media functions as a powerful tool of mind-control, not too dissimilar from what might be found in the plotlines of classic science fiction. After spending weeks or months immersed in such a controlling narrative, thinking independent thoughts let alone completely breaking free becomes a very difficult undertaking. For most individuals, the whisper in the back of their skulls overwhelms their logical reasoning, while their emotional reactions are turned on or off as if by a switch.

A perfect example of this came in the infamous U.S.S. Liberty incident of 1967. While peacefully sailing in international waters, our naval vessel was attacked by the Israelis, whose air and sea forces killed or wounded more than 200 American servicemen, and only by chance failed in their effort to sink the ship with no survivors. This constituted America’s worst naval loss of life since the huge battles of World War II, and surely if any other nation in the world had been responsible, our swift and overwhelming military retaliation would have bombed its major cities to rubble and killed many thousands of its citizens, while perhaps also hunting down and executing all the enemy leaders who had ordered that unprovoked attack.

But instead our government completely covered up that incident at the time it occurred, and the only consequence was that the annual financial tribute we paid to the Jewish State steadily increased in size. Even when the facts finally came out a dozen years later, any outrage was confined to just a small sliver of our population, while the majority who heard the story vaguely assumed that since the media told them “nothing to see here” they should move on and pay no attention. Something that under normal circumstances might have been expected to provoke a major punitive war merely produced a few uncomfortable shrugs.