__________________
Senast redigerad av Gugge-B 2017-11-15 kl. 19:12.
Senast redigerad av Gugge-B 2017-11-15 kl. 19:12.
Skumt |
77,60%
|
4021 röster |
Inte skumt |
22,40%
|
1161 röster |
“In her statement to the court, Stefania Maurizi said that she found it remarkable that, in 780 pages disclosed by the CPS so far, not one unredacted line addresses Assange’s fear of extradition to the United States, not least given he was later granted asylum by the government of Ecuador on this basis. “Something went wrong in this case,” she said, “I don’t know what.”
For the CPS, extradition lawyer Mohammed Cheema countered that disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a “very significant” chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries. Much of the CPS evidence was given in closed session, in the presence of the judges, the CPS’ lawyers and the lawyer for the Information Commissioner’s Office.
“In her statement to the court, Stefania Maurizi said that she found it remarkable that, in 780 pages disclosed by the CPS so far, not one unredacted line addresses Assange’s fear of extradition to the United States, not least given he was later granted asylum by the government of Ecuador on this basis. “Something went wrong in this case,” she said, “I don’t know what.”
For the CPS, extradition lawyer Mohammed Cheema countered that disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a “very significant” chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries. Much of the CPS evidence was given in closed session, in the presence of the judges, the CPS’ lawyers and the lawyer for the Information Commissioner’s Office.
For the CPS, extradition lawyer Mohammed Cheema countered that disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a “very significant” chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries. Much of the CPS evidence was given in closed session, in the presence of the judges, the CPS’ lawyers and the lawyer for the Information Commissioner’s Office.Men en avkylande effekt på utlämningsprocedurer till vissa (tortyr?)stater är kanske något att eftersträva, inte något att beklaga? Historien är ju trots allt full av skamliga utlämningar som kritiserats i efterhand och aldrig skulle ha skett. En avkylande effekt är precis vad man vill ha, så länge man inte själv identifierar sig med den förföljande staten.
...disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a "very significant" chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries.
...disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a "very significant" chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries.
For the CPS, extradition lawyer Mohammed Cheema countered that disclosing the information would endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations and could have a “very significant” chilling effect on extradition procedures with particular, unspecified, countries.Men en avkylande effekt på utlämningsprocedurer ...
1. so scary as to cause chills and shuddersEDIT: Kollar Linguee nu också, där översätter de det med typ både avkylande och skrämmande:
1. so scary as to cause chills and shuddersEDIT: Kollar Linguee nu också, där översätter de det med typ både avkylande och skrämmande:
Du måste vara medlem för att kunna kommentera
Flashback finansieras genom donationer från våra medlemmar och besökare. Det är med hjälp av dig vi kan fortsätta erbjuda en fri samhällsdebatt. Tack för ditt stöd!
Swish: 123 536 99 96 Bankgiro: 211-4106